Library Association Abandons Principle, Allows Censorship

When an organization organizes an annual banned books week to celebrate "the freedom to express one's opinion even if that opinion might be considered unorthodox or unpopular," it is a little disturbing to see the same group cancel a panel discussion because one of the invited speakers is considered objectionable.

But that's how the American Library Association (ALA) handled pressure from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to silence an invited speaker for a panel discussion at its annual convention who has a perspective on Islam, jihad, and terrorism that CAIR doesn't like.

Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer, author of eight books on Islam and jihad, had been scheduled to appear July 12 on an ALA panel entitled "Perspectives on Islam: Beyond the Stereotyping." ALA canceled the panel after the other speakers decided to boycott the panel due to Spencer's participation. But rather than inviting others to replace them, or letting Spencer honor his commitment, the ALA capitulated and gave the critics what they wanted.

CAIR spearheaded the drive to silence Spencer. In a letter to the ALA, CAIR-Chicago Executive Director Ahmed Rehab said he agreed in principle with promoting a diversity of opinions and opposing censorship. Still, he wrote "I ask you to rescind the invitation to Mr. Spencer in order to maintain the integrity of the panel and the reputation of the ALA." Spencer, he argued, offered "grotesque viewpoints that lie well outside the bounds of reason and civilized debate."

This complaint is from a guy who can't bring himself to condemn terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah, who has minimized the depth of the Holocaust and claimed Jews control the media.

Agree or disagree with Spencer, the episode is the latest in a series of successful efforts to silence viewpoints considered offensive to, or critical of, radical Islam.

Among the other examples:

Random House Publishing withdrew its commitment to publish the novel, The Jewel of Medina, after a professor warned it might trigger a violent backlash in the United States. The book is a fictionalized account of Aisha, the child bride of the Prophet Mohamed.
Maine officials are trying to fine the Christian Action Network (CAN) $4,000 for mailings the state considers to include an "inflammatory anti-Muslim message." CAN sent Maine residents a mailing critical of a proposed school curriculum on Islam that would have "students to pray to Allah, dress up as Muslims, adopt Muslim names, and learn the five pillars of Islam." Similar exercises for other religions are not a part of the program.
Organizers of two meetings that each were to feature controversial Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilder saw last-minute cancellations from their host hotels. In Nashville, hotel management cited safety concerns. In West Palm Beach, the Florida Security Council is suing to determine whether outside pressure led to the hotel's action.

In the ALA case, there is no doubt about what happened.

Spencer is considered "controversial," but so is anyone who challenges the conventional wisdom of the mainstream Islamist groups like CAIR, ISNA, and the Muslim Brotherhood, or who is a critic of Sharia like I am.

Spencer's participation was initially announced by Myra Appel, chairperson of the ALA's Ethnic and Multicultural Information Exchange Roundtable (EMIERT), in an email to the ALA's EMIERT mailing list on June 15. Appel sounded quite pleased with the panel at that time:

Homa Naficy, our Vice-Chair, Chair-Elect, has planned another outstanding program to inform and stimulate conversation. We invite you to join us Sunday, July 12, 2009, for our General Meeting, followed by the panel discussion, "Perspectives on Islam: Beyond the Stereotyping." Please see below a brief description of the program, the list of panelists, and the agenda for the morning of July 12th. Attached are brief speaker bios:

Islam is not new in America; over 40% of the Muslims in America are African-Americans. The change is within the Muslim immigration trend, that's grown 38 fold over the past three decades. Arriving from all over the world, China, Trinidad and Tobago, Bosnia, and Somalia, Muslims are a diverse population speaking different languages and practicing different costumes [sic]. Even the Muslims from the Middle East are not a homogeneous population. Yet the faith that binds the populations is what is often singled out and often misunderstood. Portrayed as a terrorist religion, many Muslim families and children end up victims of hate messages and harassment. This program will offer a brief overview of the cultures and literatures of the Muslim populations and the ties that bind the faith with Judaism and Christianity. Learn how your library can serve as a key forum for Islamic tolerance and all beliefs, through interfaith dialogue and programming. Panelists:

Dr. Marcia Hermansen
Director of the Islamic World Studies Program and Professor in the Theology Department Loyola University Chicago.

Dr. Esmail Koushanpour
Emeritus professor, Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago, &
Former Executive Director of the Islamic Cultural Center of Greater Chicago

Robert Spencer
Columnist and author of 8 books on Islam and jihad, including the New York Times bestsellers The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades). Director of the weblog, Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Alia Ammar, Ph.D.
Chief Neuropsychologist, Geriatric Care Association & member of the Islamic Foundation North

Despite the circulation of this email, however, panelist Hermansen expressed surprise three weeks later, on July 6, when informed in an email of Spencer's participation. In a response, she wrote:

"Thanks," she wrote in a response email, "I didn't know about this--I thought I was on an informational panel for librarians--I guess this turns up the heat!" She said nothing about withdrawing from the panel, however, until six days after that, when a July 11 CAIR press release contained this statement from her:

"While I heartily endorse the principles of free expression and diversity of viewpoints that are part of the ALA mission, the way in which this information session about Islam and Muslims for Ethnic and Multi-Cultural librarians was modified and politicized at the last moment raises serious concerns about the integrity of the session."

Hermansen did not explain why she characterized something she had known about for six days, and that had been publicly announced by the ALA nearly a month before, as a "last moment" change.

It is also noteworthy that Hermansen's July 6 email was published by Ahmed Rehab, Executive Director of CAIR-Chicago, in a July 14 piece on the controversy that he published in the Huffington Post.

Informed sources have revealed that the ALA's Appel worked closely with Rehab to satisfy CAIR's complaints about the panel, and even invited him to join the panel with Spencer, Hermansen, and the others.

Rehab refused.

CAIR subsequently pressured the other panelists to withdraw, until finally, with Spencer the only remaining participant, the ALA canceled the panel. Appel told Rehab, according to sources close to the situation, that she wanted to disinvite Spencer, but would be accused of censorship if she did so. The indirect method was a face-saving solution. And then, according to CAIR, the ALA agreed to work with CAIR to "schedule a future event on the same topic as the canceled panel discussion."

In its frenzy to placate CAIR, the ALA does not seem to have taken any notice of the fact that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case, whose operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several of its former officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. Several of its other officials have made Islamic supremacist statements. CAIR also was involved in the "Flying Imams" intimidation suit against the passengers who reported their suspicious behavior.

It is disturbing to see the ALA acquiesce in CAIR's attempt to silence Spencer's perspective, and uncritically accept the organization's defamatory characterization of him as a "bigot" – a term CAIR officials throw at anyone who exposes the nature of their organization and who works to resist the advance in the West of the global jihad in all its forms. Most disturbing of all is the fact Appel and other ALA officials seemed unconcerned about CAIR's ties to jihadist and Islamist organizations such as Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. And so they have set yet another precedent in which a group with numerous ties to terrorist and Islamist organizations determines what Americans will learn about Islam, jihad, and the terror threat.

What's the point of having principles if they are so easily tossed aside in the name of political correctness?